Skip to Main Content (Press Enter)

Logo UNISS
  • ×
  • Home
  • Degrees
  • Courses
  • Jobs
  • People
  • Outputs
  • Organizations
  • Third Mission
  • Expertise & Skills

Logo UNISS

|

UNIFIND

uniss.it
  • ×
  • Home
  • Degrees
  • Courses
  • Jobs
  • People
  • Outputs
  • Organizations
  • Third Mission
  • Expertise & Skills
  1. Outputs

Discrepant alterations in main candidate genes among multiple primary melanomas

Academic Article
Publication Date:
2014
Short description:
Discrepant alterations in main candidate genes among multiple primary melanomas / Maria, C., Mariacristina, S., Amelia, L., Vincenzo De Giorgi, ., Ignazio, S., Fabrizio, A., Daniela, M., Rubino, C., Antonella, M., Panagiotis, P., Susanna, R., Serena, M., Laura, M., Gerardo, B., Mariaelena, C., Marco, P., Ascierto, P.A., Cossu, A.G.M., Giuseppe, P., Palmieri, G.. - In: JOURNAL OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE. - ISSN 1479-5876. - 12:(2014), pp. 117-124. [10.1186/1479-5876-12-117]
abstract:
Abstract
Background: Alterations in key-regulator genes of disease pathogenesis (BRAF, cKIT, CyclinD1) have been evaluated
in patients with multiple primary melanoma (MPM).
Methods: One hundred twelve MPM patients (96 cases with two primary melanomas, 15 with three, and 1 with
four) were included into the study. Paired synchronous/asynchronous MPM tissues (N = 229) were analyzed for BRAF
mutations and cKIT/CyclynD1 gene amplifications.
Results: BRAF mutations were identified in 109/229 (48%) primary melanomas, whereas cKIT and CyclinD1
amplifications were observed in 10/216 (5%) and 29/214 (14%) tumor tissues, respectively. While frequency rates of
BRAF mutations were quite identical across the different MPM lesions, a significant increase of cKIT (p < 0.001) and
CyclinD1 (p = 0.002) amplification rates was observed between first and subsequent primary melanomas. Among
the 107 patients with paired melanoma samples, 53 (49.5%) presented consistent alteration patterns between first
and subsequent primary tumors. About one third (40/122; 32.8%) of subsequent melanomas presented a discrepant
pattern of BRAF mutations as compared to incident primary tumors.
Conclusions: The low consistency in somatic mutation patterns among MPM lesions from same patients provides
further evidence that melanomagenesis is heterogeneous and different cell types may be involved. This may have
implications in clinical practice due to the difficulties in molecularly classifying patients with discrepant primary
melanomas.
Iris type:
1.1 Articolo in rivista
Keywords:
Multiple melanoma; Mutation analysis; Gene amplification; Melanomagenesis; Molecular classification
List of contributors:
Maria, Colombino; Mariacristina, Sini; Amelia, Lissia; Vincenzo De Giorgi, ; Ignazio, Stanganelli; Fabrizio, Ayala; Daniela, Massi; Rubino, Corrado; Antonella, Manca; Panagiotis, Paliogiannis; Susanna, Rossari; Serena, Magi; Laura, Mazzoni; Gerardo, Botti; Mariaelena, Capone; Marco, Palla; Ascierto, Paolo A.; Cossu, Antonio Giuseppe Maria; Giuseppe, Palmieri; Palmieri, Giuseppe
Authors of the University:
COSSU Antonio Giuseppe Maria
PALIOGIANNIS Panagiotis
PALMIERI Giuseppe
RUBINO Corrado
Handle:
https://iris.uniss.it/handle/11388/152092
Published in:
JOURNAL OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE
Journal
  • Use of cookies

Powered by VIVO | Designed by Cineca | 26.7.2.0