Skip to Main Content (Press Enter)

Logo UNISS
  • ×
  • Home
  • Corsi
  • Insegnamenti
  • Professioni
  • Persone
  • Pubblicazioni
  • Strutture
  • Terza Missione
  • Competenze

Logo UNISS

|

UNIFIND

uniss.it
  • ×
  • Home
  • Corsi
  • Insegnamenti
  • Professioni
  • Persone
  • Pubblicazioni
  • Strutture
  • Terza Missione
  • Competenze
  1. Pubblicazioni

Robotic pancreatoduodenectomy in elderly individuals: An international multicenter propensity score–matched study by the PANFRAIL Collaborative group

Articolo
Data di Pubblicazione:
2026
Citazione:
Robotic pancreatoduodenectomy in elderly individuals: An international multicenter propensity score–matched study by the PANFRAIL Collaborative group / Marchese, T., Valle, V., Ielpo, B., Spampinato, M.G., Comandatore, A., Borgioli, L., Giulianotti, P.C., Morelli, L., De Pastena, M., Esposito, A., Salvia, R., Ietto, G., Delpini, R., Hackert, T., Afshar-Bakshloo, K., Uzunoglu, F.G., Gehrisch, F., Ross, S., Vanterpool, G., Berrevoet, F., et al.. - In: SURGERY. - ISSN 0039-6060. - 196:(2026). [10.1016/j.surg.2026.110153]
Abstract:
Introduction As life expectancy rises, more elderly patients are considered for major abdominal surgeries. Pancreatoduodenectomy in octogenarians remains challenging because of comorbidities and reduced physiological reserve. Although minimally invasive techniques such as robotic surgery may offer advantages, evidence specific to this elderly population is scarce. This study aimed to evaluate surgical outcomes in patients aged ≥80 years undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy and to compare perioperative results between robotic and open approaches. Material and Methods This multicenter retrospective study included consecutive patients aged ≥80 years who underwent robotic or open pancreatoduodenectomy across 37 international centers between January 2012 and December 2024. Propensity score matching (1:1) was performed, yielding 2 comparable cohorts of 109 patients each. Perioperative outcomes were analyzed and compared. Results Robotic pancreatoduodenectomy was associated with longer operative time (441 vs 375 minutes, P <.001) but significantly lower estimated blood loss (266 vs 565 mL, P <.001). Compared with the open group, the robotic approach showed lower rates of overall postoperative complications (52.2% vs 70.6%, P =.013), clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (9.3% vs 29.4%, P <.001), median comprehensive complication index (16 vs 24, P =.027), and shorter hospital stay (13 vs 21 days, P =.002). No significant differences were observed in 30-day (4.6% vs 6.4%, P =.180) or 90-day mortality (5.5% vs 6.4%, P =.769). Conclusions Robotic pancreatoduodenectomy appears safe and is associated with improved perioperative outcomes in octogenarians. When performed in experienced centers, the robotic approach may represent a preferable option in this elderly population.
Tipologia CRIS:
1.1 Articolo in rivista
Elenco autori:
Marchese, Tiziana; Valle, Valentina; Ielpo, Benedetto; Spampinato, Marcello Giuseppe; Comandatore, Annalisa; Borgioli, Leonardo; Giulianotti, Pier Cristoforo; Morelli, Luca; De Pastena, Matteo; Esposito, Alessandro; Salvia, Roberto; Ietto, Giuseppe; Delpini, Roberto; Hackert, Thilo; Afshar-Bakshloo, Kijan; Uzunoglu, Faik G.; Gehrisch, Fiete; Ross, Sharona; Vanterpool, Garnet; Berrevoet, Frederik; Standaert, Lars; Citterio, Davide; Mazzaferro, Vincenzo; Cereda, Marco; Ishizawa, Takeaki; Malpaga, Anna; Ciola, Michele; Gasparin, Filippo; Maroso, Fabio; Romito, Raffaele; Poletto, Edoardo; Ruzzenente, Andrea; Marchegiani, Giovanni; Cobellis, Francesco; Giannone, Fabio; Matarazzo, Francesco; Scheiterle, Maximilian; Tirloni, Luca; Furbetta, Niccolò; Guadagni, Simone; Di Franco, Gregorio; Rhaiem, Rami; Zimmermann, Perrine; Martinie, John B.; Ikuga, Robert Memba; Martìn, Marta Defez; Mastrangelo, Laura; Jovine, Elio; Vicente, Emilio; Quijano, Yolanda; Ferri, Valentina; Delis, Spiros; Iacomino, Alessandro; Zanus, Giacomo; Wray, Curtis J.; Maffeis, Federica; Porcu, Alberto; Perra, Teresa; Anselmo, Alessandro; Conte, Luigi Eduardo; Giglio, Mariano Cesare; Troisi, Roberto Ivan; Federica Dorma, Maria Pia; Rosso, Edoardo; Fassari, Alessia; Barbato, Giuseppe; Belli, Andrea; Memeo, Riccardo; Filippo, Rosalinda; Garulli, Gianluca; Giordano, Marco; Machairas, Nikolaos; Masetti, Michele; Offi, Maria Fortuna; Sergeant, Gregory; Depaifve, Yves; Goh, Brian Kp.; Koh, Ye Xin; Masuda, Yoshio; Costa, Thiago Nogueira; Burdio, Fernando; Sanchez-Velazquez, Patricia
Link alla scheda completa:
https://iris.uniss.it/handle/11388/391191
Pubblicato in:
SURGERY
Journal
  • Utilizzo dei cookie

Realizzato con VIVO | Designed by Cineca | 26.9.2.0