The Territory as an intermediate space

City, territory, architecture. Three words to supersede a dichotomy: between city and architecture, city and territory, and also architecture and territory. If considered two at a time, these words tend to emphasise their diversity more than their complementarity, as they are also positioned at each end of a range of states of affairs (things). The choice of a title with three words is also a critical reflection as regards antonymous concepts that today have invaded the debate on human settlement.
We are thinking, for example, of city and environment or, more in general, nature and artifice. The sequence in
which the three words of the title are pronounced is dictated neither by scale nor by a hierarchy, hence the second word,territory, does not follow on but is inserted, as an element common to the others, like a system of relations, anintermediate space, that presses for a reciprocal transformation of the worlds of meaning the three words evoke.