Skip to Main Content (Press Enter)

Logo UNISS
  • ×
  • Home
  • Corsi
  • Insegnamenti
  • Professioni
  • Persone
  • Pubblicazioni
  • Strutture
  • Terza Missione
  • Competenze

Logo UNISS

|

UNIFIND

uniss.it
  • ×
  • Home
  • Corsi
  • Insegnamenti
  • Professioni
  • Persone
  • Pubblicazioni
  • Strutture
  • Terza Missione
  • Competenze
  1. Pubblicazioni

Polypoidal choroidal neovascularization versus Type 1 choroidal neovascularization in age-related macular degeneration

Articolo
Data di Pubblicazione:
2022
Citazione:
Polypoidal choroidal neovascularization versus Type 1 choroidal neovascularization in age-related macular degeneration / Serra, Rita; Coscas, Florence; Cabral, Diogo; Pinna, Antonio; Coscas, Gabriel. - In: RETINA. - ISSN 0275-004X. - 42:6(2022), pp. 1005-1011. [10.1097/IAE.0000000000003439]
Abstract:
Purpose: To compare quantitative optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) parameters between polypoidal choroidal neovascularizations (PCNVs) and Type 1 choroidal neovascularizations (CNVs) in age-related macular degeneration (AMD) patients.

Methods: PCNV and Type 1 CNV lesions were retrospectively recruited in a cohort of AMD patients. All underwent a comprehensive ophthalmic evaluation including best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), fluorescein and indocyanine green angiography, structural optical coherence tomography (OCT), and OCTA. Vascular perfusion density (VPD), fractal dimension (FD), and lacunarity (LAC) were computed by means of fractal analysis of neovascular en-face OCTA slabs.

Results: 68 eyes were included in the analysis. Of them, 35/68 (51.5%) had PCNV and 33/68 (48.5%) Type 1 CNV. PCNV patients were significantly younger (p=0.0003) and had a higher BCVA (p<0.0001). Mean VPD was 0.83±0.11% in PCNVs and 0.46±0.10% in Type 1 CNVs (p<0.0001). Mean FD was 1.44±0.1 in PCNVs and 1.45±0.09 in type 1 CNVs (p=0.86), while mean LAC was 2.46±1.03 in PCNVs and 1.86±0.52 in Type 1 CNVs (p=0.006).

Conclusions: PCNVs resulted to be more heterogeneous and characterized by higher VPD and LAC values than Type 1 CNVs. These interesting findings seem to support the idea that PCNVs and Type 1 CNVs are two separate clinical entities. However, future studies based on OCTA fractal analysis, but also involving other relevant parameters such as demographics, presentation, morphology on multimodal imaging, and response to treatment, are necessary before drawing any definitive conclusions on whether PCNV is a specific clinical entity or a nAMD variant.
Tipologia CRIS:
1.1 Articolo in rivista
Keywords:
Age-related macular degeneration, Fractal dimension, Lacunarity, Optical coherence tomography angiography, Polypoidal choroidal neovascularization, Type 1 choroidal neovascularization
Elenco autori:
Serra, Rita; Coscas, Florence; Cabral, Diogo; Pinna, Antonio; Coscas, Gabriel
Autori di Ateneo:
PINNA Antonio
SERRA Rita
Link alla scheda completa:
https://iris.uniss.it/handle/11388/255981
Pubblicato in:
RETINA
Journal
  • Utilizzo dei cookie

Realizzato con VIVO | Designed by Cineca | 26.5.1.0