Skip to Main Content (Press Enter)

Logo UNISS
  • ×
  • Home
  • Degrees
  • Courses
  • Jobs
  • People
  • Outputs
  • Organizations
  • Third Mission
  • Expertise & Skills

Logo UNISS

|

UNIFIND

uniss.it
  • ×
  • Home
  • Degrees
  • Courses
  • Jobs
  • People
  • Outputs
  • Organizations
  • Third Mission
  • Expertise & Skills
  1. Outputs

The effect of benralizumab on inflammation in severe asthma: a real-life analysis

Academic Article
Publication Date:
2024
Short description:
The effect of benralizumab on inflammation in severe asthma: a real-life analysis / Visca, D., Ardesi, F., Zappa, M., Grossi, S., Pignatti, P., Vanetti, M., Pini, L., Sotgiu, G., Centis, R., Migliori, G.B., Spanevello, A.. - In: THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN RESPIRATORY DISEASE. - ISSN 1753-4658. - 18:(2024). [10.1177/17534666241304685]
abstract:
Background: Benralizumab is a monoclonal antibody treatment for severe eosinophilic asthma (SEA). Few studies investigated its role in airway inflammation and its correlation with lung function. Objectives: The aim of the present study is to assess its effect after 1 year of treatment, focusing on airway inflammation. Design: This is a retrospective observational study, in an Italian tertiary reference centre specialised in diagnosis and management of severe asthma patients. Methods: We conducted a monocentric retrospective study including SEA patients treated with benralizumab for 1 year. Clinical, functional and inflammatory data were collected at baseline, 6 (T6) and 12 (T12) months. Results: Twenty-two SEA patients on benralizumab were included. We observed a reduction in exacerbations rate and systemic steroid treatment (p < 0.0001) as well as an improvement in asthma control (p < 0.0001), health-related quality of life (p = 0.017) and lung function pre-BD FEV1 (L) (p = 0.02) and percentage (p = 0.004) and post-BD FEV1 (L) (p = 0.01) and percentage (p = 0.003) from baseline to T6 and T12. A reduction in sputum eosinophil percentage was observed at T6 and T12 (p < 0.005). We found a positive correlation between the variation of sputum eosinophils percentage and FEV1 (L) at T12 (rho = −0.79, p = 0.04). Moreover, the improvement of FEF25%–75% from baseline to 6 (rho = −0.53, p = 0.03) and 12 (rho = −0.62, p = 0.01) months negatively correlated with the duration of asthma disease. In our cohort 12/22 patients were super-responders at T6 and 15/22 at T12. Furthermore, clinical remission was reached by 12/22, and all of them obtained blood and sputum eosinophils counts normalisation. Conclusion: Our data confirm that it is a rapid and effective treatment for SEA acting on clinical, functional, systemic and airway inflammatory outcomes. Our results highlight the role of induced sputum as a promising non-invasive technique to investigate pathophysiologic mechanisms in severe asthma treated with biologics. Finally, a negative correlation between small airway improvement and the duration of asthma may suggest that a prompt referral to asthma centres may delay lung function worsening. Additional studies are needed to investigate more in-depth the role of induced sputum in the management of asthma, response to treatment and remission.
Iris type:
1.1 Articolo in rivista
Keywords:
airway inflammation; benralizumab; disease control; induced sputum; lung function; severe asthma
List of contributors:
Visca, Dina; Ardesi, Francesco; Zappa, Martina; Grossi, Sarah; Pignatti, Patrizia; Vanetti, Marco; Pini, Laura; Sotgiu, Giovanni; Centis, Rosella; Migliori, Giovanni Battista; Spanevello, Antonio
Authors of the University:
SOTGIU Giovanni
Handle:
https://iris.uniss.it/handle/11388/368509
Published in:
THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN RESPIRATORY DISEASE
Journal
  • Use of cookies

Powered by VIVO | Designed by Cineca | 26.7.2.0