Skip to Main Content (Press Enter)

Logo UNISS
  • ×
  • Home
  • Degrees
  • Courses
  • Jobs
  • People
  • Outputs
  • Organizations
  • Third Mission
  • Expertise & Skills

Logo UNISS

|

UNIFIND

uniss.it
  • ×
  • Home
  • Degrees
  • Courses
  • Jobs
  • People
  • Outputs
  • Organizations
  • Third Mission
  • Expertise & Skills
  1. Outputs

Impact of bronchoalveolar lavage on the management of immunocompromised hosts

Academic Article
Publication Date:
2024
Short description:
Impact of bronchoalveolar lavage on the management of immunocompromised hosts / Jahn, Kathleen; Karakioulaki, Meropi; Schumann, Desiree M; Hirsch, Hans H; Leuzinger, Karoline; Grize, Leticia; Aliberti, Stefano; Sotgiu, Giovanni; Tamm, Michael; Stolz, Daiana. - In: EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE. - ISSN 1879-0828. - 120:(2024), pp. 52-61. [10.1016/j.ejim.2023.09.007]
abstract:
Background: Respiratory infections are an important cause of morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised individuals. Fiberoptic bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) is an important tool to detect infectious agents in immunocompromised patients with low respiratory tract infections (LRTI). Research Question: BAL changes the management of immunocompromised patients with suspected LRTI. Study Design and Methods: Immunocompromised patients with a suspicion of LRTI underwent diagnostic BAL. The primary composite outcome consisted of pre-defined modifications in the management of the immunocompromised patients following BAL. We quantified the impact of bronchoscopy up to 30 days after the procedure. Results: A total of 2666 visits from 1301 patients were included in the study and immunosuppression was classified as haematological (n = 1040; 544 patients), solid organ transplantation (n = 666; 107 patients) and other causes (n = 960; 650 patients). BAL led to a change in management in 52.36% (n = 1396) of all cases. This percentage, as well as the 30-day mortality differed significantly amongst the three groups. Age, C-reactive protein and aetiology of infection determined significantly the risk of 30-day mortality in all patients. In 1.89% (n = 50) of all cases, a combination of 2 respiratory viral agents was identified and 24.23% (n = 646) were diagnosed with a single respiratory viral agent. Interpretation: BAL leads to changes in management in the majority of immunosuppressed patients. There is a high prevalence of multimicrobial infections and respiratory viral infections in immunocompromised patients with respiratory symptoms. Individual virus infection is associated with diverse risk of a negative outcome.
Iris type:
1.1 Articolo in rivista
Keywords:
Bronchoalveolar lavage; Fiberoptic bronchoscopy; Immunocompromised host; Immunocompromised lung disease; Infections in immunocompromised patients
List of contributors:
Jahn, Kathleen; Karakioulaki, Meropi; Schumann, Desiree M; Hirsch, Hans H; Leuzinger, Karoline; Grize, Leticia; Aliberti, Stefano; Sotgiu, Giovanni; Tamm, Michael; Stolz, Daiana
Authors of the University:
SOTGIU Giovanni
Handle:
https://iris.uniss.it/handle/11388/368506
Published in:
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
Journal
  • Use of cookies

Powered by VIVO | Designed by Cineca | 26.5.1.0