Skip to Main Content (Press Enter)

Logo UNISS
  • ×
  • Home
  • Degrees
  • Courses
  • Jobs
  • People
  • Outputs
  • Organizations
  • Third Mission
  • Expertise & Skills

Logo UNISS

|

UNIFIND

uniss.it
  • ×
  • Home
  • Degrees
  • Courses
  • Jobs
  • People
  • Outputs
  • Organizations
  • Third Mission
  • Expertise & Skills
  1. Outputs

Optimising occurrence data in species distribution models: sample size, positional uncertainty, and sampling bias matter

Academic Article
Publication Date:
2024
Short description:
Optimising occurrence data in species distribution models: sample size, positional uncertainty, and sampling bias matter / Moudrý, V., Bazzichetto, M., Remelgado, R., Devillers, R., Lenoir, J., Mateo, R.G., Lembrechts, J.J., Sillero, N., Lecours, V., Cord, A.F., Barták, V., Balej, P., Rocchini, D., Torresani, M., Arenas‐castro, S., Man, M., Prajzlerová, D., Gdulová, K., Prošek, J., Marchetto, E., et al.. - In: ECOGRAPHY. - ISSN 0906-7590. - (2024). [10.1111/ecog.07294]
abstract:
Species distribution models (SDMs) have proven valuable in filling gaps in our knowledge of species occurrences. However, despite their broad applicability, SDMs exhibit critical shortcomings due to limitations in species occurrence data. These limitations include, in particular, issues related to sample size, positional uncertainty, and sampling bias. In addition, it is widely recognised that the quality of SDMs as well as the approaches used to mitigate the impact of the aforementioned data limitations depend on species ecology. While numerous studies have evaluated the effects of these data limitations on SDM performance, a synthesis of their results is lacking. However, without a comprehensive understanding of their individual and combined effects, our ability to predict the influence of these issues on the quality of modelled species-environment associations remains largely uncertain, limiting the value of model outputs. In this paper, we review studies that have evaluated the effects of sample size, positional uncertainty, sampling bias, and species ecology on SDMs outputs. We build upon their findings to provide recommendations for the critical assessment of species data intended for use in SDMs.
Iris type:
1.1 Articolo in rivista
Keywords:
data quality; ecological niche modelling; filtering; sampling; spatial scale; validation
List of contributors:
Moudrý, Vítězslav; Bazzichetto, Manuele; Remelgado, Ruben; Devillers, Rodolphe; Lenoir, Jonathan; Mateo, Rubén G.; Lembrechts, Jonas J.; Sillero, Neftalí; Lecours, Vincent; Cord, Anna F.; Barták, Vojtěch; Balej, Petr; Rocchini, Duccio; Torresani, Michele; Arenas‐castro, Salvador; Man, Matěj; Prajzlerová, Dominika; Gdulová, Kateřina; Prošek, Jiří; Marchetto, Elisa; Zarzo‐arias, Alejandra; Gábor, Lukáš; Leroy, François; Martini, Matilde; Malavasi, Marco; Cazzolla Gatti, Roberto; Wild, Jan; Šímová, Petra
Authors of the University:
MALAVASI Marco
Handle:
https://iris.uniss.it/handle/11388/348636
Published in:
ECOGRAPHY
Journal
  • Use of cookies

Powered by VIVO | Designed by Cineca | 26.6.0.0