Skip to Main Content (Press Enter)

Logo UNISS
  • ×
  • Home
  • Degrees
  • Courses
  • Jobs
  • People
  • Outputs
  • Organizations
  • Third Mission
  • Expertise & Skills

Logo UNISS

|

UNIFIND

uniss.it
  • ×
  • Home
  • Degrees
  • Courses
  • Jobs
  • People
  • Outputs
  • Organizations
  • Third Mission
  • Expertise & Skills
  1. Outputs

A Systematic Review of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Caries Prevention following the AGREE II Checklist

Academic Article
Publication Date:
2023
Short description:
A Systematic Review of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Caries Prevention following the AGREE II Checklist / Lamloum, D., Arghittu, A., Ferrara, P., Castiglia, P., Dettori, M., Gaeta, M., Odone, A., Campus, G.. - In: HEALTHCARE. - ISSN 2227-9032. - 11:13(2023), p. 1895. [10.3390/healthcare11131895]
abstract:
: Untreated oral diseases are detrimental to overall well-being and quality of life and are in close relationship with social and economic consequences. The presence of strong evidence for caries primary and secondary prevention is a compulsory tool for the development of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). This paper was aimed to assess systematically the importance of clinical practice guidelines in caries prevention management considering both the adult and pediatric populations and evaluate them using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) Checklist. Records were extracted from EMBASE, SCOPUS, PubMed/Medline and seven other relevant guideline databases between 6 January and 14 February 2023. Two reviewers independently conducted the appraisal using the web-based platform My AGREE PLUS. Twenty-one guidelines/papers met the inclusion criteria and were reviewed. Eight CPGs included both primary and secondary prevention interventions, whereas thirteen presented a single preventive model. Overall, 12 guidelines were published in the USA. The mean AGREE II scores ranged from 35.4% to 84.3%. Of the total twenty-one included guidelines, twelve were classified as "Recommended", ranging from 56.3% to 84.3%, the others were described as "Recommended with modification", ranging from 35.4% to 68.9%. From the AGREE II analysis carried out, the CPGs included in this survey adopted a punctual methodological rigor but lacked applicative power. The present survey showed that the public, as the primary beneficiary, played a limited role in the development of the twenty-one CPGs. Hence, methodological improvement can better support high-quality CPG development in the future.
Iris type:
1.1 Articolo in rivista
Keywords:
AGREE II; evidence-based dentistry; guidelines; public health dentistry
List of contributors:
Lamloum, Demetrio; Arghittu, Antonella; Ferrara, Pietro; Castiglia, Paolo; Dettori, Marco; Gaeta, Maddalena; Odone, Anna; Campus, Guglielmo
Authors of the University:
ARGHITTU Antonella
CASTIGLIA Paolo Giuseppino
DETTORI Marco
Handle:
https://iris.uniss.it/handle/11388/312951
Published in:
HEALTHCARE
Journal
  • Use of cookies

Powered by VIVO | Designed by Cineca | 26.7.0.0