Skip to Main Content (Press Enter)

Logo UNISS
  • ×
  • Home
  • Corsi
  • Insegnamenti
  • Professioni
  • Persone
  • Pubblicazioni
  • Strutture
  • Terza Missione
  • Competenze

Logo UNISS

|

UNIFIND

uniss.it
  • ×
  • Home
  • Corsi
  • Insegnamenti
  • Professioni
  • Persone
  • Pubblicazioni
  • Strutture
  • Terza Missione
  • Competenze
  1. Pubblicazioni

Validity and reliability of the total rating of eye, nasal, and dry-mouth (TREND) score

Articolo
Data di Pubblicazione:
2026
Citazione:
Validity and reliability of the total rating of eye, nasal, and dry-mouth (TREND) score / Lechien, J. R.; Chiesa-Estomba, C. M.; Mayo-Yanez, M.; Iannella, G.; Barillari, M. R.; Guarino, P.; Lazzeroni, M.; Saibene, A. M.; Cammaroto, G.; Salzano, G.; Andrianakis, A.; Hemptinne, C.; Saussez, S.; Maniaci, A.; Vaira, L. A.. - In: EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY. - ISSN 0937-4477. - (2026). [10.1007/s00405-026-10216-w]
Abstract:
Objective: To develop and validate the total rating of eye, nasal, and dry-mouth (TREND) score, which is a patient-reported outcome measure of upper aerodigestive tract mucosa dryness. Method: Patients with dry symptoms and findings of mouth, laryngopharynx, nose, and eyes were prospectively recruited between June 2024 to November 2025. Patients and healthy individuals completed TREND score within a 7-day period to assess test-retest reliability. Internal consistency was measured using Cronbach’s α for TREND items and sub- and total scores in patients and controls. For patients with dry vocal fold or reflux-related dry throat, validity was evaluated by comparing the TREND with the reflux symptom score (RSS) and the voice handicap index (VHI). Dry findings were collected. Pre-to posttreatment evolution of TREND was assessed to evaluate the responsiveness to change. Results: A total of 164 consecutive patients with dry mucosa complaints completed evaluations (106 females), alongside 85 controls (44 females). Mean TREND sub-/total scores were significantly higher in patients versus controls, demonstrating adequate discriminant validity. External validity showed moderate-to-strong correlations between TREND and RSS in LPRD patients (rs=0.650;95%CI: 0.535–0.742;p = 0.001) and between TREND and VHI in hoarseness patients (rs=0.437;95%CI: 0.234–0.603;p = 0.001). Internal consistency was high (α = 0.856), with moderate-to-high test-retest reliability. ROC analysis suggested a TREND > 19 as pathological threshold in this population (AUC = 0.837;sensitivity:83.5%,specificity:54.8%; Youden index:0.383). Conclusion: TREND score is a valid and reliable patient-reported outcome questionnaire documenting dry throat, mouth, nose, and eye symptoms in otolaryngology. Future studies are needed to establish psychometric properties of TREND in several other dry disorders.
Tipologia CRIS:
1.1 Articolo in rivista
Keywords:
Dry; Dryness; Eye; Measure; Nose; Otolaryngology; Patient-reported outcome; Throat
Elenco autori:
Lechien, J. R.; Chiesa-Estomba, C. M.; Mayo-Yanez, M.; Iannella, G.; Barillari, M. R.; Guarino, P.; Lazzeroni, M.; Saibene, A. M.; Cammaroto, G.; Salzano, G.; Andrianakis, A.; Hemptinne, C.; Saussez, S.; Maniaci, A.; Vaira, L. A.
Autori di Ateneo:
VAIRA Luigi Angelo
Link alla scheda completa:
https://iris.uniss.it/handle/11388/385652
Pubblicato in:
EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY
Journal
  • Utilizzo dei cookie

Realizzato con VIVO | Designed by Cineca | 26.5.1.0