Skip to Main Content (Press Enter)

Logo UNISS
  • ×
  • Home
  • Corsi
  • Insegnamenti
  • Professioni
  • Persone
  • Pubblicazioni
  • Strutture
  • Terza Missione
  • Competenze

Logo UNISS

|

UNIFIND

uniss.it
  • ×
  • Home
  • Corsi
  • Insegnamenti
  • Professioni
  • Persone
  • Pubblicazioni
  • Strutture
  • Terza Missione
  • Competenze
  1. Pubblicazioni

Cost-Effectiveness Study of Double-Flange Voice Prostheses in the Treatment of Periprosthetic Leakage in Laryngectomized Patients

Articolo
Data di Pubblicazione:
2023
Citazione:
Cost-Effectiveness Study of Double-Flange Voice Prostheses in the Treatment of Periprosthetic Leakage in Laryngectomized Patients / Rodriguez-Lorenzana, P.; Mayo-Yanez, M.; Chiesa-Estomba, C. M.; Vaira, L. A.; Lechien, J. R.; Maniaci, A.; Cabo-Varela, I.. - In: JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE. - ISSN 2075-4426. - 13:7(2023). [10.3390/jpm13071064]
Abstract:
Background: Tracheoesophageal speech with a voice prosthesis is considered the rehabilitation treatment of choice in laryngectomized patients. The main reasons for prosthesis failure are endoprosthetic leakage and periprosthetic leakage. The Provox XtraSeal® stent incorporates an additional double flange on the esophageal side to prevent periprosthetic leakage. The objective of this study is to compare the duration and costs of the Provox Vega® and Provox XtraSeal® prostheses used in these patients in a tertiary university hospital. Materials and methods: A prospective crossover case study of laryngectomees with Provox Vega® who underwent Provox XtraSeal® placement due to recurrent periprosthetic leaks and decreased theoretical prosthesis life. The duration and possible factors affecting voice prostheses were studied using Kaplan–Meier curves and Cox regression. A cost-effectiveness analysis was carried out from the perspective of the Spanish National Health System with an incremental cost-effectiveness calculation. Results: A total of 38 patients were recruited, 35 men and 3 women, with a mean age of 66.26 ± 9.36 years old. Information was collected from 551 voice prostheses, 484 Provox Vega® and 68 Provox XtraSeal®. The mean duration of Provox Vega® was 119.75 ± 148.8 days and that of Provox XtraSeal® was 181.99 ± 166.07 days (p = 0.002). The most frequent reason for replacement was endoprosthetic leakage in both groups: 283 (60.86%) in the case of Provox Vega® and 29 (48.33%) in that of XtraSeal® (p < 0.000). To obtain no cost differences (ICE ~ 0) between Provox Vega and Provox XtraSeal, the latter should cost EUR 551.63. Conclusions: The Provox XtraSeal® is a cost-effective option in patients with increased prosthesis replacements due to periprosthetic leakage, reducing the number of replacements, increasing the duration of the prosthesis, and providing savings compared to Provox Vega®.
Tipologia CRIS:
1.1 Articolo in rivista
Keywords:
cost effectiveness; device life; head neck; laryngectomy; Provox Vega; Provox XtraSeal; tracheoesophageal speech; voice prosthesis
Elenco autori:
Rodriguez-Lorenzana, P.; Mayo-Yanez, M.; Chiesa-Estomba, C. M.; Vaira, L. A.; Lechien, J. R.; Maniaci, A.; Cabo-Varela, I.
Autori di Ateneo:
VAIRA Luigi Angelo
Link alla scheda completa:
https://iris.uniss.it/handle/11388/324820
Pubblicato in:
JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE
Journal
  • Utilizzo dei cookie

Realizzato con VIVO | Designed by Cineca | 26.5.2.0