Skip to Main Content (Press Enter)

Logo UNISS
  • ×
  • Home
  • Corsi
  • Insegnamenti
  • Professioni
  • Persone
  • Pubblicazioni
  • Strutture
  • Terza Missione
  • Competenze

Logo UNISS

|

UNIFIND

uniss.it
  • ×
  • Home
  • Corsi
  • Insegnamenti
  • Professioni
  • Persone
  • Pubblicazioni
  • Strutture
  • Terza Missione
  • Competenze
  1. Pubblicazioni

eDNA metabarcoding for biodiversity assessment, generalist predators as sampling assistants

Articolo
Data di Pubblicazione:
2021
Citazione:
eDNA metabarcoding for biodiversity assessment, generalist predators as sampling assistants / Norgaard, L.; Olesen, C. R.; Trojelsgaard, K.; Pertoldi, C.; Nielsen, J. L.; Taberlet, P.; Ruiz-Gonzalez, A.; De Barba, M.; Iacolina, L.. - In: SCIENTIFIC REPORTS. - ISSN 2045-2322. - 11:1(2021), p. 6820. [10.1038/s41598-021-85488-9]
Abstract:
With an accelerating negative impact of anthropogenic actions on natural ecosystems, non-invasive biodiversity assessments are becoming increasingly crucial. As a consequence, the interest in the application of environmental DNA (eDNA) survey techniques has increased. The use of eDNA extracted from faeces from generalist predators, have recently been described as “biodiversity capsules” and suggested as a complementary tool for improving current biodiversity assessments. In this study, using faecal samples from two generalist omnivore species, the Eurasian badger and the red fox, we evaluated the applicability of eDNA metabarcoding in determining dietary composition, compared to macroscopic diet identification techniques. Subsequently, we used the dietary information obtained to assess its contribution to biodiversity assessments. Compared to classic macroscopic techniques, we found that eDNA metabarcoding detected more taxa, at higher taxonomic resolution, and proved to be an important technique to verify the species identification of the predator from field collected faeces. Furthermore, we showed how dietary analyses complemented field observations in describing biodiversity by identifying consumed flora and fauna that went unnoticed during field observations. While diet analysis approaches could not substitute field observations entirely, we suggest that their integration with other methods might overcome intrinsic limitations of single techniques in future biodiversity surveys.
Tipologia CRIS:
1.1 Articolo in rivista
Elenco autori:
Norgaard, L.; Olesen, C. R.; Trojelsgaard, K.; Pertoldi, C.; Nielsen, J. L.; Taberlet, P.; Ruiz-Gonzalez, A.; De Barba, M.; Iacolina, L.
Autori di Ateneo:
IACOLINA Laura
Link alla scheda completa:
https://iris.uniss.it/handle/11388/301811
Link al Full Text:
https://iris.uniss.it//retrieve/handle/11388/301811/272710/Norgaard%20et%20al%202021_SciRep_eDNA%20metabarcoding%20for%20biodiversity%20assessment.pdf
Pubblicato in:
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Journal
  • Dati Generali

Dati Generali

URL

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-85488-9
  • Utilizzo dei cookie

Realizzato con VIVO | Designed by Cineca | 26.5.0.0